25 May 2010, 10:44 PM

Spectre of the Past

The photograph seemed out of place in a science textbook. But there it was, looking for all the world like something out of a war zone. I’m not sure I fully understood what I was looking at at the time, but I’ve remembered it. Now, years later, I’ve found it again, and I think I understand it a bit better.

This was the picture (public domain from the FDA, via Wikimedia Commons):

That was the iron lung ward at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, circa 1953. That was polio.

Andrew Wakefield, the vile fraud who started the MMR vaccine scare and is thus responsible for unnecessary illness and death in hundreds of children, may have been stricken from Britain’s medical register this week, but the fight against the anti-vaccine conspiracy movement is far from over. We’ve come so far in so little time. Lest we ever forget, this is what’s at stake.

12 May 2009, 1:58 PM

Salient Notes on Antivax

Antivaccinationist claims are many and varied, and it would be impractical to try to address all of them thoroughly in one place. There are, however, a few recurring themes.

My mother recently asked me to give her a summary of the vaccine controversy; she knew few details, but wanted something to share with coworkers who had concerns about vaccinating their children. Therefore, I threw together this quick list of notes for her based on my memory of all that I’ve read since I started following this issue.

A more thoroughly researched resource by Todd W can be found at http://antiantivax.jottit.com/ (via BA). I may decide to go through my list here and cite sources at some point, and maybe even add a few topics I missed, but really this was just intended as an introduction to topics in the antivax manufactroversy (manufactured controversy), a launching point (if need be) for more in-depth inquiry.

My notes are below the fold:

Read the rest of this entry »

11 May 2009, 9:50 PM

Undaunted by Oprah

Back in February, Orac noted that the tide seemed to be turning in the fight against antivaccinationists, and predicted that 2009 would be a banner year for the forces of reason if our efforts could be sustained. Unfortunately, the antivaxxers aren’t about to make it easy for us.

As you’ve likely already heard,  Jenny McCarthy signed a multi-year deal with Oprah Winfrey’s Harpo Productions, giving the antivax “mommy warrior” her own talk show, a blog on Oprah’s webstie, and who knows what other privileges. Skeptics throughout the blogosphere cried out in lamentation when the news broke last Monday, and with good reason. Oprah has already been largely responsible for launching Jenny’s dangerous antivax message. This new development will at the least serve to further legitimize McCarthy, if not to directly spread her medical ignorance.

Still, I remain optimistic that Orac’s prediction may yet pan out. As the antivaxxers become more vocal, so, too, do their opponents.

Clearly, it would be incredible if we could get Oprah to rescind her endorsement of McCarthy. But as satisfying as it would be to see Oprah smash Jenny into a million little pieces, I’m not holding my breath. It’s discouraging enough that she has such a long, full history of promoting magical thinkers. But more importantly, antivaccinationism (and McCarthy’s role therein) is no mystery. Unless Oprah utterly failed to vet her latest acquisition, she should have had some exposure to the facts by now, which means that she has decided either not to believe the facts, or not to care.

Oprah may in some instances be a fool, but she’s clearly not stupid, at least when it comes down to business. Her schtick is all about empowering women, and that’s precisely Jenny McCarthy’s mission. Never mind, apparently, that she’s empowering women to rebel against medicine, to spread disease and endanger children.

Meanwhile, the continued media presence of the antivax movement will give us all the more opportunities to speak against them. More and more, the fence-sitters on this issue will be prompted to choose a side, and I remain optimistic that we on the side of reason can sway them. We have the facts on our side, for one thing. Sadly, thanks to antivax efforts, we also have a growing narrative. Since the inception of the antivax movement, they have claimed the narrative of helpless children and families squaring off against a cold, faceless medical establishment. However, as the consequences of declining vaccination rates build, we’re more and more able to put a human face on our side of the struggle, faces like those of Dana McCaffery, or the daughter of James Randerson, environmental editor for The Guardian.

The antivaxxers are going to continue to get louder, and granted, Jenny McCarthy’s deal with Oprah could be pretty damn loud. But their message is bankrupt. If we remain diligent, we may yet be turning things around.

26 Apr 2009, 6:17 PM

Measles by the Truckload

John Kricfalusi, best known as the creator of “Ren & Stimpy,” posted to his blog last month a collection of excerpts from a comic book from 1948, about a couple of guys who volunteer to publicise a new private hospital but wind up causing the doctors even more grief in the process. (You can read the whole comic here.) John K posted it to show off Milt Gross’ artwork, but one panel in particular stood out to me for a different reason:

We got measles!

This was what measles meant to me when I was growing up: it was a fictional disease, a gag, the sort of thing you only ever saw on TV or in books. No one ever got measles in real life; at least, no one I knew. I guess that makes me incredibly fortunate; in Milt’s day, a dumptruck full of children with measles probably wasn’t too much more out of the ordinary than any other dumptruck full of children.

But thanks to antivaccinationists, this specter of the past may be a vision of the future. That’s no laughing matter. As Phil Plait noted today, children are dying of vaccine-preventable illnesses. Vaccine denialists, in their misguided quest to associate vaccines with health risks such as autism (a thoroughly debunked hypothesis), are doing real damage to humanity.

And the antivaxxers are apparently okay with that. In an interview with Larry King on 4 April, antivax celebrity duo Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey had this to say:

KING: Isn’t the problem here, Jenny, that people sometimes listen with one ear are going to panic. And not vaccine at all?

MCCARTHY: Probably. But guess what? It’s not my fault. The reason why they’re not vaccinating is because the vaccines are not safe. Make a better product and then parents will vaccinate.

CARREY: We’re not the problem. The problem is the problem.

(For more on that interview, see Science-Based Medicine)

Jen, Jim, here’s the thing. You think you smell smoke. You think you see flames. So you’re raising the alarm, because even if people panic and get injured in the stampede for the exits, it’s better than letting the building burn down around them, right? But you’re wrong about the danger. There is no fire. We’ve tried to explain this to you, but you refuse to listen to reason. And we’re trying to calm the crowd, but it’s hard when you keep inciting them to panic.

You think you’re in the right, but you’re emphatically not. The problem you’re warning about doesn’t exist. Meanwhile, you’re shouting “fire!” in a crowded theatre, and people–real people–are getting hurt. That is your fault. You are the problem.